rss
JAMIA 1994;1:447-458 doi:10.1136/jamia.1994.95153434
  • Original Investigation
  • Research Paper

Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINE

  1. R Brian Haynes,
  2. Nancy Wilczynski,
  3. K Ann McKibbon,
  4. Cynthia J Walker,
  5. JC Sinclair
  1. Affiliation of the authors: Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  1. Correspondence and reprints: R. Brian Haynes. MD, PhD, McMaster University Medical Center, Room 3H7, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3z5, Canada. e-mail: BHAYNES@MCMASTER.CA

    Abstract

    Objective To develop optimal MEDLINE search strategies for retrieving sound clinical studies of the etiology, prognosis, diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of disorders in adult general medicine.

    Design Analytic survey of operating characteristics of search strategies developed by computerized combinations of terms selected to detect studies meeting basic methodologic criteria for direct clinical use in adult general medicine.

    Measures The sensitivities, specificities, precision, and accuracy of 134,264 unique combinations of search terms were determined by comparison with a manual review of all articles (the “gold standard”) in ten internal medicine and general medicine journals for 1986 and 1991.

    Results Less than half of the studies of the topics of interest met basic criteria for scientific merit for testing clinical applications. Combinations of search terms reached peak sensitivities of 82% for sound studies of etiology, 92% for prognosis, 92% for diagnosis, and 99% for therapy in 1991. Compared with the best single terms, multiple terms increased sensitivity for sound studies by over 30% (absolute increase), but with some loss of specificity when sensitivity was maximized. For 1986, combinations reached peak sensitivities of 72% for etiology, 95% for prognosis, 86% for diagnosis, and 98% for therapy. When search terms were combined to maximize specificity, over 93% specificity was achieved for all purpose categories in both years. Compared with individual terms, combined terms achieved near-perfect specificity that was maintained with modest increases insensitivity in all purpose categories except therapy. Increases in accuracy were achieved by combining terms for all purpose categories, with peak accuracies reaching over 90% for therapy in 1986 and 1991.

    Conclusions The retrieval of studies of important clinical topics cited in MEDLINE can be substantially enhanced by selected combinations of indexing terms and textwords.

    Footnotes

    • Supported by The Ontario Ministry of Health (grant no 02651) and the United States National Library of Medicine (grant no. R01 LM 04696). Dr. Haynes is supported in part by a National Health Scientist Award from the National Health Research and Development Program of Canada.

    Access policy for JAMIA

    All content published in JAMIA is deposited with PubMedCentral by the publisher but with varying embargo times. Authors/funders may pay an Unlocked fee of $2,000 to make the article free on the JAMIA website and PMC immediately on publication. Research funded by government and other recognised agencies is deposited with a 12 month embargo. All other content is deposited with a 36 month embargo.

    AMIA members log in here to access the full text of JAMIA.

    Register for free content

    Individuals may register for a free 30 day online trial to all content.

    The Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association is published for the American Medical Informatics Association by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.