rss
JAMIA 2003;10:177-187 doi:10.1197/jamia.M1175
  • Original Investigation
  • Research Paper

The Effect of Computer-generated Reminders on Charting Deficiencies in the ICU

  1. Thomas A Oniki,
  2. Terry P Clemmer,
  3. T Allan Pryor
  1. Affiliations of the authors: Oracle Corporation, Redwood Shores, California (TAO); LDS Hospital Department of Critical Care and University of Utah Departments of Internal Medicine and Medical Informatics, Salt Lake City, Utah (TPC); University of Utah Department of Medical Informatics (emeritus), Salt Lake City, Utah (TAP)
  1. Correspondence and reprints: Tom Oniki, PhD, 9740 Dynasty Way, Elk Grove, CA 95624; e-mail: <tom.oniki{at}oracle.com>
  • Received 13 June 2002
  • Accepted 13 November 2002

Abstract

Objective To examine the effect of computer-generated reminders on nurse charting deficiencies in two intensive care units.

Design Nurses caring for a group of 60 study patients received patient-specific paper reminder reports when charting deficiencies were found at mid-day. Nurses caring for a group of 60 control patients received no reminders. A group of 60 retrospective patients was also formed.

Measurements The average numbers of charting deficiencies at the end of the shift in each of the three groups were compared using two planned orthogonal contrasts.

Results The average in the study group patients was 1.02 deficiencies per day per patient, whereas the control group the average was 1.40 deficiencies per day per patient (p = 0.001). The average number of end-of-shift deficiencies in the pooled prospective (study/control) population was 1.21 deficiencies per day per patient, compared with the average in the retrospective group of 1.56 deficiencies per day per patient (p < 0.001).

Conclusion The decrease was likely due both to the appropriate response of the nurses to the reminders and to a learned attentiveness to the tasks on the part of the nurses who cared for study patients. Greater gains were hindered by incomplete "coupling" of the reminders to the end-of-shift deficiencies and by inaccuracies in the reminders.

Footnotes

    Access policy for JAMIA

    All content published in JAMIA is deposited with PubMedCentral by the publisher but with varying embargo times. Authors/funders may pay an Unlocked fee of $2,000 to make the article free on the JAMIA website and PMC immediately on publication. Research funded by government and other recognised agencies is deposited with a 12 month embargo. All other content is deposited with a 36 month embargo.

    The Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association is published for the American Medical Informatics Association by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.