Electronically Screening Discharge Summaries for Adverse Medical Events
- Affiliations of the authors: Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Dr. Murff and Dr. Peterson are currently in the Division of General Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Ms. Fiskio, Dr. Heiman, and Dr. Bates are currently in the Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Dr. Forster is currently at the University of Ottawa, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Ottawa Health Research Unit, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Correspondence and reprints: David W. Bates,MD, MSc, Chief, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115; e-mail: <dbates{at}partners.org>
- Received 8 August 2002
- Accepted 29 January 2003
Abstract
Objective Detecting adverse events is pivotal for measuring and improving medical safety, yet current techniques discourage routine screening. The authors hypothesized that discharge summaries would include information on adverse events, and they developed and evaluated an electronic method for screening medical discharge summaries for adverse events.
Design A cohort study including 424 randomly selected admissions to the medical services of an academic medical center was conducted between January and July 2000. The authors developed a computerized screening tool that searched free-text discharge summaries for trigger words representing possible adverse events.
Measurements All discharge summaries with a trigger word present underwent chart review by two independent physician reviewers. The presence of adverse events was assessed using structured implicit judgment. A random sample of discharge summaries without trigger words also was reviewed.
Results Fifty-nine percent (251 of 424) of the discharge summaries contained trigger words. Based on discharge summary review, 44.8% (327 of 730) of the alerted trigger words indicated a possible adverse event. After medical record review, the tool detected 131 adverse events. The sensitivity and specificity of the screening tool were 69% and 48%, respectively. The positive predictive value of the tool was 52%.
Conclusion Medical discharge summaries contain information regarding adverse events. Electronic screening of discharge summaries for adverse events using keyword searches is feasible but thus far has poor specificity. Nonetheless, computerized clinical narrative screening methods could potentially offer researchers and quality managers a means to routinely detect adverse events.
Footnotes
-
A part of this material has been presented as a poster at the 2001 American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium (Murff HJ, Forster AJ, Peterson JF, Fiskio JM, Heiman HL, Bates DW. Electronically screening discharge summaries for adverse medical events. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;(6 suppl):S50–1) and the 2002 Society of General Internal Medicine National Meeting (Murff HJ, Forster AJ, Peterson JF, Fiskio JM, Heiman HL, Bates DW. Electronically screening discharge summaries for adverse medical events. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(suppl 1):A205).
-
Dr. Murff was supported by a NRSA training grant, 5T321101-12, over the duration of the project.








