rss
JAMIA 2004;11:95-99 doi:10.1197/jamia.M1427
  • Perspectives on CPOE and Patient Care Information Systems
  • Research Paper

Computerized Physician Order Entry in U.S. Hospitals: Results of a 2002 Survey

  1. Joan S Ash,
  2. Paul N Gorman,
  3. Veena Seshadri,
  4. William R Hersh
  1. Affiliation of the authors: Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
  1. Correspondence and reprints: Joan S. Ash, PhD, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97201-3098; e-mail: ash{at}ohsu.edu.
  • Received 15 July 2003
  • Accepted 20 October 2003

Abstract

Objective To determine the availability of inpatient computerized physician order entry in U.S. hospitals and the degree to which physicians are using it.

Design Combined mail and telephone survey of 964 randomly selected hospitals, contrasting 2002 data and results of a survey conducted in 1997.

Measurements Availability: computerized order entry has been installed and is available for use by physicians; inducement: the degree to which use of computers to enter orders is required of physicians; participation: the proportion of physicians at an institution who enter orders by computer; and saturation: the proportion of total orders at an institution entered by a physician using a computer.

Results The response rate was 65%. Computerized order entry was not available to physicians at 524 (83.7%) of 626 hospitals responding, whereas 60 (9.6%) reported complete availability and 41 (6.5%) reported partial availability. Of 91 hospitals providing data about inducement/requirement to use the system, it was optional at 31 (34.1%), encouraged at 18 (19.8%), and required at 42 (46.2%). At 36 hospitals (45.6%), more than 90% of physicians on staff use the system, whereas six (7.6%) reported 51–90% participation and 37 (46.8%) reported participation by fewer than half of physicians. Saturation was bimodal, with 25 (35%) hospitals reporting that more than 90% of all orders are entered by physicians using a computer and 20 (28.2%) reporting that less than 10% of all orders are entered this way.

Conclusion Despite increasing consensus about the desirability of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) use, these data indicate that only 9.6% of U.S. hospitals presently have CPOE completely available. In those hospitals that have CPOE, its use is frequently required. In approximately half of those hospitals, more than 90% of physicians use CPOE; in one-third of them, more than 90% of orders are entered via CPOE.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported initially by a grant from Mr. Paul Mongerson and then by National Library of Medicine grant L06942-02. The authors thank Lara Fournier, MS, and Britt Ash, AB, for their assistance with data gathering; Richard Dykstra, MD, and Dean Sittig, PhD, for their help interpreting the results; and Vanessa Dorr, RN, MSN, for help with both the mailing list and interpretation.

Access policy for JAMIA

All content published in JAMIA is deposited with PubMedCentral by the publisher but with varying embargo times. Authors/funders may pay an Unlocked fee of $2,000 to make the article free on the JAMIA website and PMC immediately on publication. Research funded by government and other recognised agencies is deposited with a 12 month embargo. All other content is deposited with a 36 month embargo.

AMIA members log in here to access the full text of JAMIA.

Register for free content

Individuals may register for a free 30 day online trial to all content.

The Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association is published for the American Medical Informatics Association by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.