rss
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:41-47 doi:10.1197/jamia.M2184
  • Focus on Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE)
  • Viewpoint Paper

Viewpoint: Controversies Surrounding Use of Order Sets for Clinical Decision Support in Computerized Provider Order Entry

  1. Anne M Bobb,
  2. Thomas H Payne,
  3. Peter A Gross
  1. Affiliations of the authors: Department of Quality and Operations, Northwestern Memorial Hospital (AMB), Chicago, IL; Department of Information Technology Services, UW Medicine, University of Washington (THP), Seattle, WA; Departments of Internal Medicine, Hackensack University Medical Center (PAG), Hackensack, NJ; UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School (PAG), Newark, NJ
  1. Correspondence and reprints: Anne M Bobb, BS Pharm, 676 North St. Clair Street, Suite 700, Chicago, IL 60611; Tel: (312) 926-9176; Fax: (312) 926-8734; e-mail: <abobb{at}nmh.org>
  • Received 20 June 2006
  • Accepted 16 October 2006

Abstract

Order sets provide straightforward clinical decision support within computerized provider order entry systems. They make “the right thing” easier to do because they are much faster than writing single orders; they deliver real-time, evidence-based prompts; they are easy to update; and they support coverage of multiple patient problems through linkages among order sets. This viewpoint paper discusses controversies surrounding use of order sets—advantages and pitfalls, decision-making criteria, and organizational considerations, including suggestions for vendors. Order sets have the potential to improve clinician efficiency, provide real-time guidance, facilitate compliance with Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services performance measure sets, and encourage overall acceptance of computerized provider order entry, but may not do so unless these controversies are addressed.

Footnotes

    This Article

    Services

    1. Request permissions

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Social bookmarking

    Access policy for JAMIA

    All content published in JAMIA is deposited with PubMed Central by the publisher with a 12 month embargo. Authors/funders may pay an Unlocked fee of $2,000 to make the article free on the JAMIA website and PMC immediately on publication.

    All content older than 12 months is freely available on this website.

    AMIA members can log in with their JAMIA user name (email address) and password or via the AMIA website.