Measuring Clinical Information Technology in the ICU Setting: Application in a Quality Improvement Collaborative
- Ruben Amarasingham,
- Peter J Pronovost,
- Marie Diener-West,
- Christine Goeschel,
- Todd Dorman,
- David R Thiemann,
- Neil R Powe
- Affiliations of the authors: Department of Care Management and Outcomes Research (RA), Parkland Health & Hospital System, Dallas, TX; Department of Medicine (RA), University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (PJP, TD), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Biostatistics (MD-W), Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Michigan Health & Hospital Association (CG), Keystone Center for Patient Safety and Quality, Detroit, MI; Departments of Cardiology and Health Sciences Informatics, (DRT), School of Medicine; Department of Epidemiology (DRT), Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Department of Medicine (NRP), School of Medicine; Departments of Epidemiology and Health Policy & Management (NRP), Bloomberg School of Public Health and Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Correspondence and reprint requests: Ruben Amarasingham, MD, MBA, Medical Director of Medicine Services, 5123 Harry Hines Blvd, Support Bldg. B, Parkland Health & Hospital System, Dallas, Texas 75235; e-mail: <ramara{at}parknet.pmh.org>
- Received 2 September 2006
- Accepted 8 February 2007
Abstract
Objective Few instruments are available to measure the performance of intensive care unit (ICU) clinical information systems. Our objectives were: 1) to develop a survey-based metric that assesses the automation and usability of an ICU’s clinical information system; 2) to determine whether higher scores on this instrument correlate with improved outcomes in a multi-institution quality improvement collaborative.
Design This is a cross-sectional study of the medical directors of 19 Michigan ICUs participating in a state-wide quality improvement collaborative designed to reduce the rate of catheter-related blood stream infections (CRBSI). Respondents completed a survey assessing their ICU’s information systems.
Measurements The mean of 54 summed items on this instrument yields the clinical information technology (CIT) index, a global measure of the ICU’s information system performance on a 100 point scale. The dependent variable in this study was the rate of CRBSI after the implementation of several evidence-based recommendations. A multivariable linear regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between the CIT score and the post-intervention CRBSI rates after adjustment for the pre-intervention rate.
Results In this cross-sectional analysis, we found that a 10 point increase in the CIT score is associated with 4.6 fewer catheter related infections per 1,000 central line days for ICUs who participate in the quality improvement intervention for 1 year (95% CI: 1.0 to 8.0).
Conclusions This study presents a new instrument to examine ICU information system effectiveness. The results suggest that the presence of more sophisticated information systems was associated with greater reductions in the bloodstream infection rate.
Footnotes
-
The authors thank the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (1UC1HS14246) for their support of this work.
