rss
JAMIA 2007;14:407-414 doi:10.1197/jamia.M2398
  • Original Investigation
  • Research Paper

Patient-Care Questions that Physicians Are Unable to Answer

  1. John W Ely,
  2. Jerome A Osheroff,
  3. Saverio M Maviglia,
  4. Marcy E Rosenbaum
  1. Affiliations of the authors: Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA; Thomson Healthcare, Greenwood Village, CO; University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA; Partners Healthcare System, Inc., Chestnut Hill, MA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  1. Correspondence and reprints: John W. Ely, MD, MSPH, Department of Family Medicine, 01291-D PFP, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, Iowa 52242; e-mail: <john-ely{at}uiowa.edu>
  • Received 3 February 2007
  • Accepted 2 April 2007

Abstract

Objective To describe the characteristics of unanswered clinical questions and propose interventions that could improve the chance of finding answers.

Design In a previous study, investigators observed primary care physicians in their offices and recorded questions that arose during patient care. Questions that were pursued by the physician, but remained unanswered, were grouped into generic types. In the present study, investigators attempted to answer these questions and developed recommendations aimed at improving the success rate of finding answers.

Measurements Frequency of unanswered question types and recommendations to increase the chance of finding answers.

Results In an earlier study, 48 physicians asked 1062 questions during 192 half-day office observations. Physicians could not find answers to 237 (41%) of the 585 questions they pursued. The present study grouped the unanswered questions into 19 generic types. Three types accounted for 128 (54%) of the unanswered questions: (1) “Undiagnosed finding” questions asked about the management of abnormal clinical findings, such as symptoms, signs, and test results (What is the approach to finding X?); (2) “Conditional” questions contained qualifying conditions that were appended to otherwise simple questions (What is the management of X, given Y? where “given Y” is the qualifying condition that makes the question difficult.); and (3) “Compound” questions asked about the association between two highly specific elements (Can X cause Y?). The study identified strategies to improve clinical information retrieval, listed below.

Conclusion To improve the chance of finding answers, physicians should change their search strategies by rephrasing their questions and searching more clinically oriented resources. Authors of clinical information resources should anticipate questions that may arise in practice, and clinical information systems should provide clearer and more explicit answers.

Footnotes

  • This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Library of Medicine (1R01LM07179-01). This study was presented in abstract form at the Annual Meeting of the North American Primary Care Research Group in Tucson, Arizona on October 17, 2006. JWE has served as a consultant for Thomson, which publishes topic reviews and related material for clinicians on managing clinical conditions as part of Micromedex. JAO is chief clinical informatics officer of Thomson. SMM has served as a consultant for Thomson and is the developer of KnowledgeLink which provides context-specific clinical information at the point of care.

Access policy for JAMIA

All content published in JAMIA is deposited with PubMedCentral by the publisher but with varying embargo times. Authors/funders may pay an Unlocked fee of $2,000 to make the article free on the JAMIA website and PMC immediately on publication. Research funded by government and other recognised agencies is deposited with a 12 month embargo. All other content is deposited with a 36 month embargo.

The Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association is published for the American Medical Informatics Association by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.