rss
J Am Med Inform Assoc 14:415-423 doi:10.1197/jamia.M2373
  • Original Investigation
  • Research Paper

The Extent and Importance of Unintended Consequences Related to Computerized Provider Order Entry

  1. Joan S Ash,
  2. Dean F Sittig,
  3. Eric G Poon,
  4. Kenneth Guappone,
  5. Emily Campbell,
  6. Richard H Dykstra
  1. Affiliations of the authors: Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Northwest Permanente, Portland, OR; Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  1. Correspondence and reprints: Joan S. Ash, Ph.D., Department of Medica(l Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR 97201-3098; e-mail: <ash{at}ohsu.edu>
  • Received 10 January 2007
  • Accepted 10 April 2007

Abstract

Background Computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems can help hospitals improve health care quality, but they can also introduce new problems. The extent to which hospitals experience unintended consequences of CPOE, which include more than errors, has not been quantified in prior research.

Objective To discover the extent and importance of unintended adverse consequences related to CPOE implementation in U.S. hospitals.

Design, Setting, and Participants Building on a prior qualitative study involving fieldwork at five hospitals, we developed and then administered a telephone survey concerning the extent and importance of CPOE-related unintended adverse consequences to representatives from 176 hospitals in the U.S. that have CPOE.

Measurements Self report by key informants of the extent and level of importance to the overall function of the hospital of eight types of unintended adverse consequences experienced by sites with inpatient CPOE.

Results We found that hospitals experienced all eight types of unintended adverse consequences, although respondents identified several they considered more important than others. Those related to new work/more work, workflow, system demands, communication, emotions, and dependence on the technology were ranked as most severe, with at least 72% of respondents ranking them as moderately to very important. Hospital representatives are less sure about shifts in the power structure and CPOE as a new source of errors. There is no relation between kinds of unintended consequences and number of years CPOE has been used. Despite the relatively short length of time most hospitals have had CPOE (median five years), it is highly infused, or embedded, within work practice at most of these sites.

Conclusions The unintended consequences of CPOE are widespread and important to those knowledgeable about CPOE in hospitals. They can be positive, negative, or both, depending on one’s perspective, and they continue to exist over the duration of use. Aggressive detection and management of adverse unintended consequences is vital for CPOE success.

Footnotes

  • This research was supported by grant LM06942 from the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, titled Overcoming the Unintended Consequences of Computerized Physician Order Entry Implementation. Emily Campbell and Dr. Guappone were also supported by National Library of Medicine training grant ASMMI0031. The authors extend special thanks to Caroline Wethern, Cody Curtis, and Ashley Jones for their assistance with data collection and organization.

Free Sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JAMIA.
View free sample issue >>

Access policy for JAMIA

All content published in JAMIA is deposited with PubMed Central by the publisher with a 12 month embargo. Authors/funders may pay an Open Access fee of $2,000 to make the article free on the JAMIA website and PMC immediately on publication.

All content older than 12 months is freely available on this website.

AMIA members can log in with their JAMIA user name (email address) and password or via the AMIA website.

Navigate This Article