Situational Relevance of Information Derived from InfoRetriever by Objective (N=156 Critical Searches)
| Situational relevance | ||||||
| Objective | More relevant | Relevant | Relevant but less | Not relevant | Total % | N |
| C1 clinical question-problem-decision | 1.9% | 32.7% | 0.6% | 6.4% | 41.7% | 65 |
| C2 educational-research objective | 0.6% | 26.9% | 1.3% | 3.8% | 32.7% | 51 |
| C3 curiosity-personal interest | 0.0% | 7.7% | 0.0% | 1.3% | 9.0% | 14 |
| C4 overcome memory limitation | 0.0% | 5.8% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 6.4% | 10 |
| O1 share information with patients | 0.0% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 2.6% | 4 |
| O2 exchange information with profs | 1.3% | 2.6% | 0.0% | 1.3% | 5.1% | 8 |
| O3 plan-manage-monitor | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.6% | 4 |
| Total % | 5.1% | 78.8% | 1.9% | 14.1% | 100% | |
| N | 8 | 123 | 3 | 22 | 156 |
-
More relevant = Information derived from InfoRetriever is more relevant as compared to information from other source(s) for achieving the objective.
Relevant = Information derived from InfoRetriever is relevant for achieving the objective, or equally relevant as compared to information from other source(s).
Relevant but less = Information derived from InfoRetriever is relevant for achieving the objective but less relevant as compared to information from other source(s).
Not relevant = Information derived from InfoRetriever is not relevant for achieving the objective.
