rss
J Am Med Inform Assoc 15:203-211 doi:10.1197/jamia.M2461
  • Original Investigation
  • Research Paper

A Randomized Effectiveness Trial of a Clinical Informatics Consult Service: Impact on Evidence-based Decision-making and Knowledge Implementation

  1. Shelagh A Mulvaneya,
  2. Leonard Bickmanb,
  3. Nunzia B Giusec,d,
  4. E Warren Lambertb,
  5. Nila A Sathed,
  6. Rebecca N Jeromec,d
  1. aSchool of Nursing and Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
  2. bPeabody College of Vanderbilt University, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
  3. cDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
  4. dEskind Biomedical Library, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
  1. Correspondence and reprints: Shelagh Mulvaney, PhD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, School of Nursing, 461 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37240 (Email: shelagh.mulvaney{at}vanderbilt.edu)
  • Received 30 March 2007
  • Accepted 7 December 2007

Abstract

Objective To determine the effectiveness of providing synthesized research evidence to inform patient care practices via an evidence based informatics program, the Clinical Informatics Consult Service (CICS).

Design Consults were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: CICS Provided, in which clinicians received synthesized information from the biomedical literature addressing the consult question or No CICS Provided, in which no information was provided.

Measurement Outcomes were measured via online post-consult forms that assessed consult purpose, actual and potential impact, satisfaction, time spent searching, and other variables.

Results Two hundred twenty six consults were made during the 19-month study period. Clinicians primarily made requests in order to update themselves (65.0%, 147/226) and were satisfied with the service results (Mean 4.52 of possible 5.0, SD 0.94). Intention to treat (ITT) analyses showed that consults in the CICS Provided condition had a greater actual and potential impact on clinical actions and clinician satisfaction than No CICS consults. Evidence provided by the service primarily impacted the use of a new or different treatment (OR 8.19 95% CI 1.04–64.00). Reasons for no or little impact included a lack of evidence addressing the issue or that the clinician was already implementing the practices indicated by the evidence.

Conclusions Clinical decision-making, particularly regarding treatment issues, was statistically significantly impacted by the service. Programs such as the CICS may provide an effective tool for facilitating the integration of research evidence into the management of complex patient care and may foster clinicians’ engagement with the biomedical literature.

Footnotes

  • Research Supported by NLM 5 R01 LM07849 to N. Giuse, (PI).

Free Sample

This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JAMIA.
View free sample issue >>

Access policy for JAMIA

All content published in JAMIA is deposited with PubMed Central by the publisher with a 12 month embargo. Authors/funders may pay an Open Access fee of $2,000 to make the article free on the JAMIA website and PMC immediately on publication.

All content older than 12 months is freely available on this website.

AMIA members can log in with their JAMIA user name (email address) and password or via the AMIA website.

Navigate This Article