Table 1
Responses to the Question “PAML Builder would be easier to use if:”
| Category | Number of Answers (% of the Total) | |
| Prescribers | Nonprescribers | |
| Total number of responders to the question | 137 | 96 |
| Order entry integration | 45 (33) | 2 (2.1) |
| Interface | 24 (18) | 11 (12) |
| Better clinician compliance | 2 (1.5) | 19 (20) |
| Better medication information sources | 15 (11) | 4 (4.2) |
| Fewer annoying prompts | 14 (10) | 1 (1.0) |
| Better training | 5 (3.6) | 7 (7.3) |
| Exposure too limited to judge | 2 (1.5) | 8 (8.3) |
| The application was faster | 8 (5.8) | 1 (1.0) |
| Nurses entered the medications | 2 (1.5) | 6 (6.3) |
| Patients knew their medications | 0 (0) | 7 (7.3) |
| Other | 11 (8.0) | 17 (18) |
-
Distribution of answers to the free-text question “PAML Builder would be easier to use if:”. All answers were manually classified into one of the above categories.
