rss
JAMIA 2009;16:40-46 doi:10.1197/jamia.M2808
  • The Practice of Informatics
  • Viewpoint Paper

Tiering Drug–Drug Interaction Alerts by Severity Increases Compliance Rates

  1. Marilyn D Paternoa,
  2. Saverio M Mavigliaa,b,
  3. Paul N Gormanc,
  4. Diane L Segera,
  5. Eileen Yoshidaa,
  6. Andrew C Segera,b,d,
  7. David W Batesa,b,
  8. Tejal K Gandhib
  1. aDepartment of Information Systems, Partners HealthCare System, Boston, MA
  2. bDivision of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  3. cDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, OR
  4. dMassachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Science, Boston MA
  1. Correspondence: Marilyn D. Paterno, MBI, Partners Health Care System, Inc., 93 Worcester Street, Suite 201, Wellesley Hills, MA 02481; e-mail: <mdpaterno{at}partners.org>
  • Received 31 March 2008
  • Accepted 27 September 2008

Abstract

Objective Few data exist measuring the effect of differentiating drug–drug interaction (DDI) alerts in computerized provider order entry systems (CPOE) by level of severity (“tiering”). We sought to determine if rates of provider compliance with DDI alerts in the inpatient setting differed when a tiered presentation was implemented.

Design We performed a retrospective analysis of alert log data on hospitalized patients at two academic medical centers during the period from 2/1/2004 through 2/1/2005. Both inpatient CPOE systems used the same DDI checking service, but one displayed alerts differentially by severity level (tiered presentation, including hard stops for the most severe alerts) while the other did not. Participants were adult inpatients who generated a DDI alert, and providers who wrote the orders. Alerts were presented during the order entry process, providing the clinician with the opportunity to change the patient's medication orders to avoid the interaction.

Measurements Rate of compliance to alerts at a tiered site compared to a non-tiered site.

Results We reviewed 71,350 alerts, of which 39,474 occurred at the non-tiered site and 31,876 at the tiered site. Compliance with DDI alerts was significantly higher at the site with tiered DDI alerts compared to the non-tiered site (29% vs. 10%, p < 0.001). At the tiered site, 100% of the most severe alerts were accepted, vs. only 34% at the non-tiered site; moderately severe alerts were also more likely to be accepted at the tiered site (29% vs. 10%).

Conclusion Tiered alerting by severity was associated with higher compliance rates of DDI alerts in the inpatient setting, and lack of tiering was associated with a high override rate of more severe alerts.

Footnotes

  • Dr. Bates serves as a consultant to Healthgate, which makes tools that allow collaboration around development of decision support. He is a consultant for Cardinal Health, which makes intravenous drug delivery systems.

Access policy for JAMIA

All content published in JAMIA is deposited with PubMedCentral by the publisher but with varying embargo times. Authors/funders may pay an Unlocked fee of $2,000 to make the article free on the JAMIA website and PMC immediately on publication. Research funded by government and other recognised agencies is deposited with a 12 month embargo. All other content is deposited with a 36 month embargo.

The Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association is published for the American Medical Informatics Association by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.