rss
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:338-345 doi:10.1197/jamia.M2772
  • Original Investigation
  • Research Paper

Forecasting Emergency Department Crowding: A Prospective, Real-time Evaluation

  1. Nathan R Hoota,
  2. Larry J LeBlancb,
  3. Ian Jonesa,
  4. Scott R Levinc,
  5. Chuan Zhoua,
  6. Cynthia S Gadda,
  7. Dominik Aronskya
  1. aVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
  2. bOwen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
  3. cJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
  1. Correspondence: Nathan R. Hoot, 400 Eskind Biomedical Library, 2209 Garland Avenue, Nashville, TN 37232; e-mail: <nathan.hoot{at}vanderbilt.edu>
  • Received 25 February 2008
  • Accepted 3 February 2009

Abstract

Objective Emergency department crowding threatens quality and access to health care, and a method of accurately forecasting near-future crowding should enable novel ways to alleviate the problem. The authors sought to implement and validate the previously developed ForecastED discrete event simulation for real-time forecasting of emergency department crowding.

Design and Measurements The authors conducted a prospective observational study during a three-month period (5/1/07–8/1/07) in the adult emergency department of a tertiary care medical center. The authors connected the forecasting tool to existing information systems to obtain real-time forecasts of operational data, updated every 10 minutes. The outcome measures included the emergency department waiting count, waiting time, occupancy level, length of stay, boarding count, boarding time, and ambulance diversion; each forecast 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours into the future.

Results The authors obtained crowding forecasts at 13,239 10-minute intervals, out of 13,248 possible (99.9%). The R2 values for predicting operational data 8 hours into the future, with 95% confidence intervals, were 0.27 (0.26, 0.29) for waiting count, 0.11 (0.10, 0.12) for waiting time, 0.57 (0.55, 0.58) for occupancy level, 0.69 (0.68, 0.70) for length of stay, 0.61 (0.59, 0.62) for boarding count, and 0.53 (0.51, 0.54) for boarding time. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting ambulance diversion 8 hours into the future, with 95% confidence intervals, was 0.85 (0.84, 0.86).

Conclusions The ForecastED tool provides accurate forecasts of several input, throughput, and output measures of crowding up to 8 hours into the future. The real-time deployment of the system should be feasible at other emergency departments that have six patient-level variables available through information systems.

Footnotes

    Access policy for JAMIA

    All content published in JAMIA is deposited with PubMed Central by the publisher with a 12 month embargo. Authors/funders may pay an Unlocked fee of $2,000 to make the article free on the JAMIA website and PMC immediately on publication.

    All content older than 12 months is freely available on this website.

    AMIA members can log in with their JAMIA user name (email address) and password or via the AMIA website.