Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for the union of all blocking schemes across different weight scaling approaches
| Scaling Approach | TP | FN | FP | TN | SENS (%) | SPEC (%) | PPV (%) |
| No scaling | 8,991 | 154 | 18 | 144 | 98.3 | 88.9 | 99.8 |
| Scale bottom 5% | 9,082 | 63 | 18 | 144 | 99.3 | 88.9 | 99.8 |
| Scale bottom 10% | 9,082 | 63 | 18 | 144 | 99.3 | 88.9 | 99.8 |
| Scale below median | 9,082 | 63 | 18 | 144 | 99.3 | 88.9 | 99.8 |
| Scale below mean | 9,082 | 63 | 18 | 144 | 99.3 | 88.9 | 99.8 |
| Scale top and bottom 10% | 8,989 | 156 | 15 | 147 | 98.3 | 90.7 | 99.8 |
| Scale top 10% | 8,723 | 422 | 2 | 160 | 95.4 | 98.8 | 99.9 |
| Scale above median | 8,723 | 422 | 2 | 160 | 95.4 | 98.8 | 99.9 |
| Scale above mean | 8,723 | 422 | 2 | 160 | 95.4 | 98.8 | 99.9 |
| Scale all | 8,725 | 420 | 2 | 160 | 95.4 | 98.8 | 99.9 |
FN = false-negative; FP = false-positive; PPV = positive predictive value; SENS = sensitivity; SPEC = specificity; TN = true-negative; TP = true-positive.









