The impact of computerized provider order entry on medication errors in a multispecialty group practice
- Emily Beth Devine1,2,
- Ryan N Hansen1,
- Jennifer L Wilson-Norton3,
- N M Lawless3,
- Albert W Fisk3,
- David K Blough1,
- Diane P Martin4,
- Sean D Sullivan1,4
- 1Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- 2Division of Biomedical and Health Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- 3The Everett Clinic, Everett, Washington, USA
- 4Department of Health Services, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Correspondence to Dr E B Devine, Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program and Biomedical and Health Informatics, University of Washington, Box 357630, Seattle, WA 98195-7630, USA; bdevine{at}u.washington.edu
- Received 28 May 2009
- Accepted 20 October 2009
Abstract
Objective Computerized provider order entry (CPOE) has been shown to improve patient safety by reducing medication errors and subsequent adverse drug events (ADEs). Studies demonstrating these benefits have been conducted primarily in the inpatient setting, with fewer in the ambulatory setting. The objective was to evaluate the effect of a basic, ambulatory CPOE system on medication errors and associated ADEs.
Design This quasiexperimental, pretest–post-test study was conducted in a community-based, multispecialty health system not affiliated with an academic medical center. The intervention was a basic CPOE system with limited clinical decision support capabilities.
Measurement Comparison of prescriptions written before (n=5016 handwritten) to after (n=5153 electronically prescribed) implementation of the CPOE system. The primary outcome was the occurrence of error(s); secondary outcomes were types and severity of errors.
Results Frequency of errors declined from 18.2% to 8.2%—a reduction in adjusted odds of 70% (OR: 0.30; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.40). The largest reductions were seen in adjusted odds of errors of illegibility (97%), use of inappropriate abbreviations (94%) and missing information (85%). There was a 57% reduction in adjusted odds of errors that did not cause harm (potential ADEs) (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.49). The reduction in the number of errors that caused harm (preventable ADEs) was not statistically significant, perhaps due to few errors in this category.
Conclusions A basic CPOE system in a community setting was associated with a significant reduction in medication errors of most types and severity levels.
Footnotes
-
Supplementary Appendix is available online only at http://jamia.bmj.com/content/vol17/issue1
-
Preliminary results of this research were presented in two venues in 2008: the 14th Annual National Research Service Award (NRSA) Trainees Research Conference, held in conjunction with Academy Health (podium) and the AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings 2008 (poster).
-
Funding This research was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ): Health Information Technology Grant #: 5-UC1 HS015319 (PI: Sullivan); Mentored Clinical Scientist Training Grant #: 5-K08-HS014739 (PI: Devine).
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.









