rss
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:185-191 doi:10.1136/jamia.2009.002451
  • Research paper

The impact of electronic medical records data sources on an adverse drug event quality measure

  1. Michael G Kahn1,2,3,
  2. Daksha Ranade3
  1. 1Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado, USA
  2. 2Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Aurora, Colorado, USA
  3. 3Department of Clinical Informatics, The Children's Hospital, Aurora, Colorado, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Michael G Kahn, Department of Pediatrics, c/o The Children's Hospital, 13123 East 16th Avenue, B400, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA; Michael.Kahn{at}ucdenver.edu
  • Received 9 August 2009
  • Accepted 14 December 2009

Abstract

Objective To examine the impact of billing and clinical data extracted from an electronic medical record system on the calculation of an adverse drug event (ADE) quality measure approved for use in The Joint Commission's ORYX program, a mandatory national hospital quality reporting system.

Design The Child Health Corporation of America's “Use of Rescue Agents—ADE Trigger” quality measure uses medication billing data contained in the Pediatric Health Information Systems (PHIS) data warehouse to create The Joint Commission-approved quality measure. Using a similar query, we calculated the quality measure using PHIS plus four data sources extracted from our electronic medical record (EMR) system: medications charged, medication orders placed, medication orders with associated charges (orders charged), and medications administered.

Measurements Inclusion and exclusion criteria were identical for all queries. Denominators and numerators were calculated using the five data sets. The reported quality measure is the ADE rate (numerator/denominator).

Results Significant differences in denominators, numerators, and rates were calculated from different data sources within a single institution's EMR. Differences were due to both common clinical practices that may be similar across institutions and unique workflow practices not likely to be present at any other institution. The magnitude of the differences would significantly alter the national comparative ranking of our institution compared to other PHIS institutions.

Conclusions More detailed clinical information may result in quality measures that are not comparable across institutions due institution-specific workflow, differences that are exposed using EMR-derived data.

Footnotes

  • Funding MGK is supported in part by Colorado CTSA grant 1 UL1 RR 025780 from NCRR/NIH and the TCH Research Institute.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Access policy for JAMIA

All content published in JAMIA is deposited with PubMed Central by the publisher with a 12 month embargo. Authors/funders may pay an Unlocked fee of $2,000 to make the article free on the JAMIA website and PMC immediately on publication.

All content older than 12 months is freely available on this website.

AMIA members can log in with their JAMIA user name (email address) and password or via the AMIA website.