rss
J Am Med Inform Assoc 17:681-688 doi:10.1136/jamia.2009.002568
  • Research paper

Impact of generic substitution decision support on electronic prescribing behavior

Editor's Choice
  1. Kevin B Johnson1
  1. 1Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  2. 2Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Shane P Stenner, 2209 Garland Avenue, 400 Eskind Biomedical Library, Nashville, TN 37232-8340, USA; shane.stenner{at}vanderbilt.edu
  1. Contributors Conception and design: SPS, KBJ. Analysis and interpretation of the data: SPS, QC, KBJ. Drafting of the article: SPS, QC, KBJ. Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: SPS, KBJ. Final approval of the article: SPS, KBJ. Provision of study materials or patients: KBJ. Statistical expertise: QC, KBJ. Administrative, technical, or logistic support: KBJ. Collection and assembly of data: SPS, KBJ.

  • Received 19 August 2009
  • Accepted 28 August 2010

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the impact of generic substitution decision support on electronic (e-) prescribing of generic medications.

Design The authors analyzed retrospective outpatient e-prescribing data from an academic medical center and affiliated network for July 1, 2005–September 30, 2008 using an interrupted time-series design to assess the rate of generic prescribing before and after implementing generic substitution decision support. To assess background secular trends, e-prescribing was compared with a concurrent random sample of hand-generated prescriptions.

Measurements Proportion of generic medications prescribed before and after the intervention, evaluated over time, and compared with a sample of prescriptions generated without e-prescribing.

Results The proportion of generic medication prescriptions increased from 32.1% to 54.2% after the intervention (22.1% increase, 95% CI 21.9% to 22.3%), with no diminution in magnitude of improvement post-intervention. In the concurrent control group, increases in proportion of generic prescriptions (29.3% to 31.4% to 37.4% in the pre-intervention, post-intervention, and end-of-study periods, respectively) were not commensurate with the intervention. There was a larger change in generic prescribing rates among authorized prescribers (24.6%) than nurses (18.5%; adjusted OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.63). Two years after the intervention, the proportion of generic prescribing remained significantly higher for e-prescriptions (58.1%; 95% CI 57.5% to 58.7%) than for hand-generated prescriptions ordered at the same time (37.4%; 95% CI 34.9% to 39.9%) (p<0.0001). Generic prescribing increased significantly in every specialty.

Conclusion Implementation of generic substitution decision support was associated with dramatic and sustained improvements in the rate of outpatient generic e-prescribing across all specialties.

Footnotes

  • Funding SPS was funded by grant #5 T15 LM007450-07 from the National Library of Medicine.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. Dr Randolph A Miller did not participate in the peer review of this manuscript.

Access policy for JAMIA

All content published in JAMIA is deposited with PubMed Central by the publisher with a 12 month embargo. Authors/funders may pay an Unlocked fee of $2,000 to make the article free on the JAMIA website and PMC immediately on publication.

All content older than 12 months is freely available on this website.

AMIA members can log in with their JAMIA user name (email address) and password or via the AMIA website.