Impact of generic substitution decision support on electronic prescribing behavior
- 1Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- 2Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Correspondence to Dr Shane P Stenner, 2209 Garland Avenue, 400 Eskind Biomedical Library, Nashville, TN 37232-8340, USA; shane.stenner{at}vanderbilt.edu
-
Contributors Conception and design: SPS, KBJ. Analysis and interpretation of the data: SPS, QC, KBJ. Drafting of the article: SPS, QC, KBJ. Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: SPS, KBJ. Final approval of the article: SPS, KBJ. Provision of study materials or patients: KBJ. Statistical expertise: QC, KBJ. Administrative, technical, or logistic support: KBJ. Collection and assembly of data: SPS, KBJ.
- Received 19 August 2009
- Accepted 28 August 2010
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the impact of generic substitution decision support on electronic (e-) prescribing of generic medications.
Design The authors analyzed retrospective outpatient e-prescribing data from an academic medical center and affiliated network for July 1, 2005–September 30, 2008 using an interrupted time-series design to assess the rate of generic prescribing before and after implementing generic substitution decision support. To assess background secular trends, e-prescribing was compared with a concurrent random sample of hand-generated prescriptions.
Measurements Proportion of generic medications prescribed before and after the intervention, evaluated over time, and compared with a sample of prescriptions generated without e-prescribing.
Results The proportion of generic medication prescriptions increased from 32.1% to 54.2% after the intervention (22.1% increase, 95% CI 21.9% to 22.3%), with no diminution in magnitude of improvement post-intervention. In the concurrent control group, increases in proportion of generic prescriptions (29.3% to 31.4% to 37.4% in the pre-intervention, post-intervention, and end-of-study periods, respectively) were not commensurate with the intervention. There was a larger change in generic prescribing rates among authorized prescribers (24.6%) than nurses (18.5%; adjusted OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.63). Two years after the intervention, the proportion of generic prescribing remained significantly higher for e-prescriptions (58.1%; 95% CI 57.5% to 58.7%) than for hand-generated prescriptions ordered at the same time (37.4%; 95% CI 34.9% to 39.9%) (p<0.0001). Generic prescribing increased significantly in every specialty.
Conclusion Implementation of generic substitution decision support was associated with dramatic and sustained improvements in the rate of outpatient generic e-prescribing across all specialties.
Footnotes
-
Funding SPS was funded by grant #5 T15 LM007450-07 from the National Library of Medicine.
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. Dr Randolph A Miller did not participate in the peer review of this manuscript.









