Normalized names for clinical drugs: RxNorm at 6 years
- Correspondence to Stuart J Nelson, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bldg 1DEM, Room 202G, 6701 Democracy Blvd, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA;
- Received 11 February 2011
- Accepted 24 March 2011
- Published Online First 21 April 2011
Objective In the 6 years since the National Library of Medicine began monthly releases of RxNorm, RxNorm has become a central resource for communicating about clinical drugs and supporting interoperation between drug vocabularies.
Materials and methods Built on the idea of a normalized name for a medication at a given level of abstraction, RxNorm provides a set of names and relationships based on 11 different external source vocabularies. The standard model enables decision support to take place for a variety of uses at the appropriate level of abstraction. With the incorporation of National Drug File Reference Terminology (NDF-RT) from the Veterans Administration, even more sophisticated decision support has become possible.
Discussion While related products such as RxTerms, RxNav, MyMedicationList, and MyRxPad have been recognized as helpful for various uses, tasks such as identifying exactly what is and is not on the market remain a challenge.
- knowledge representations
- natural-language processing
- information storage and retrieval (text and images)
- data models
- developing/using computerized provider order entry
- personal health records and self-care systems
- developing/using clinical decision support (other than diagnostic) and guideline systems
- systems to support and improve diagnostic accuracy
- distributed systems
- software engineering: architecture
- developing and refining EHR Data standards (including image standards)
- controlled terminologies and vocabularies
The work of maintaining the documentation, inverting and inserting multiple sources into RxNorm, as well as distribution of the RxNorm vocabulary and maintenance of the RxNorm website is done by the Office of Computer and Communications Systems (OCCS) of the National Library of Medicine.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.