rss
J Am Med Inform Assoc 19:72-78 doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000332
  • Research and applications

Prevalence of medication administration errors in two medical units with automated prescription and dispensing

  1. Maria Sanjurjo-Saez1
  1. 1Department of Pharmacy, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
  2. 2Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
  1. Correspondence to Carmen Guadalupe Rodriguez-Gonzalez, Pharmacy, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid 28007, Spain; crodriguezg.hgugm{at}salud.madrid.org
  • Received 26 April 2011
  • Accepted 8 August 2011
  • Published Online First 2 September 2011

Abstract

Objective To identify the frequency of medication administration errors and their potential risk factors in units using a computerized prescription order entry program and profiled automated dispensing cabinets.

Design Prospective observational study conducted within two clinical units of the Gastroenterology Department in a 1537-bed tertiary teaching hospital in Madrid (Spain).

Measurements Medication errors were measured using the disguised observation technique. Types of medication errors and their potential severity were described. The correlation between potential risk factors and medication errors was studied to identify potential causes.

Results In total, 2314 medication administrations to 73 patients were observed: 509 errors were recorded (22.0%)—68 (13.4%) in preparation and 441 (86.6%) in administration. The most frequent errors were use of wrong administration techniques (especially concerning food intake (13.9%)), wrong reconstitution/dilution (1.7%), omission (1.4%), and wrong infusion speed (1.2%). Errors were classified as no damage (95.7%), no damage but monitoring required (2.3%), and temporary damage (0.4%). Potential clinical severity could not be assessed in 1.6% of cases. The potential risk factors morning shift, evening shift, Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical medication class antacids, prokinetics, antibiotics and immunosuppressants, oral administration, and intravenous administration were associated with a higher risk of administration errors. No association was found with variables related to understaffing or nurse's experience.

Conclusions Medication administration errors persist in units with automated prescription and dispensing. We identified a need to improve nurses' working procedures and to implement a Clinical Decision Support tool that generates recommendations about scheduling according to dietary restrictions, preparation of medication before parenteral administration, and adequate infusion rates.

Footnotes

  • Funding Spanish Ministry of Health and Social Policy, Grant No 9982 (Royal Decree 924/2009, dated May 29) (Official State Bulletin, Tuesday, June 16, 2009).

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Related Article

Access policy for JAMIA

All content published in JAMIA is deposited with PubMed Central by the publisher with a 12 month embargo. Authors/funders may pay an Unlocked fee of $2,000 to make the article free on the JAMIA website and PMC immediately on publication.

All content older than 12 months is freely available on this website.

AMIA members can log in with their JAMIA user name (email address) and password or via the AMIA website.