Patient engagement in the inpatient setting: a systematic review
- Jennifer E Prey1,
- Janet Woollen1,
- Lauren Wilcox2,
- Alexander D Sackeim3,
- George Hripcsak1,
- Suzanne Bakken1,4,
- Susan Restaino5,6,
- Steven Feiner2,
- David K Vawdrey1
- 1Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
- 2Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
- 3College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
- 4School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
- 5Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
- 6NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- Correspondence to Jennifer Prey, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, 622 W. 168th St. VC-5, New York, NY 10032, USA;
- Received 28 June 2013
- Revised 31 October 2013
- Accepted 5 November 2013
- Published Online First 22 November 2013
Objective To systematically review existing literature regarding patient engagement technologies used in the inpatient setting.
Methods PubMed, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies that discussed patient engagement (‘self-efficacy’, ‘patient empowerment’, ‘patient activation’, or ‘patient engagement’), (2) involved health information technology (‘technology’, ‘games’, ‘electronic health record’, ‘electronic medical record’, or ‘personal health record’), and (3) took place in the inpatient setting (‘inpatient’ or ‘hospital’). Only English language studies were reviewed.
Results 17 articles were identified describing the topic of inpatient patient engagement. A few articles identified design requirements for inpatient engagement technology. The remainder described interventions, which we grouped into five categories: entertainment, generic health information delivery, patient-specific information delivery, advanced communication tools, and personalized decision support.
Conclusions Examination of the current literature shows there are considerable gaps in knowledge regarding patient engagement in the hospital setting and inconsistent use of terminology regarding patient engagement overall. Research on inpatient engagement technologies has been limited, especially concerning the impact on health outcomes and cost-effectiveness.