rss
J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997;4:442-457 doi:10.1136/jamia.1997.0040442
  • The Practice of Informatics
  • Position Paper

Recommendations for Responsible Monitoring and Regulation of Clinical Software Systems

  1. Randolph A Miller,
  2. Reed M GardnerFor the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA), the Computer-based Patient Record Institute (CPRI), the Medical Library Association (MLA), the Association of Academic Health Science Libraries (AAHSL), the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA), the American Nurses Association
  1. Affiliations of the authors: Past President (RAM), and President (RMG) of the American Medical Informatics Association, Bethesda, MD
  1. Correspondence and reprints: Randolph A. Miller, MD, Room 436, Eskind Library, 2209 Garland Ave., Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232.E-mail: randy.miller{at}mcmail.vanderbilt.edu
  • Received 3 July 1997
  • Accepted 17 July 1997

Abstract

In mid-1996, the FDA called for discussions on regulation of clinical software programs as medical devices. In response, a consortium of organizations dedicated to improving health care through information technology has developed recommendations for the responsible regulation and monitoring of clinical software systems by users, vendors, and regulatory agencies. Organizations assisting in development of recommendations, or endorsing the consortium position include the American Medical Informatics Association, the Computer-based Patient Record Institute, the Medical Library Association, the Association of Academic Health Sciences Libraries, the American Health Information Management Association, the American Nurses Association, the Center for Healthcare Information Management, and the American College of Physicians. The consortium proposes four categories of clinical system risks and four classes of measured monitoring and regulatory actions that can be applied strategically based on the level of risk in a given setting. The consortium recommends local oversight of clinical software systems, and adoption by healthcare information system developers of a code of good business practices. Budgetary and other constraints limit the type and number of systems that the FDA can regulate effectively. FDA regulation should exempt most clinical software systems and focus on those systems posing highest clinical risk, with limited opportunities for competent human intervention.

Footnotes

  • Dr. Miller's efforts have been supported in part by Grants 5-G08-LM-05443 and 1-R01-LM-06226 from the National Library of Medicine.

This Article

Services

  1. Request permissions

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Social bookmarking

Access policy for JAMIA

All content published in JAMIA is deposited with PubMed Central by the publisher with a 12 month embargo. Authors/funders may pay an Unlocked fee of $2,000 to make the article free on the JAMIA website and PMC immediately on publication.

All content older than 12 months is freely available on this website.

AMIA members can log in with their JAMIA user name (email address) and password or via the AMIA website.