rss
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002;9:199-208 doi:10.1197/jamia.M1081
  • Focus on Extending Clinical Communication
  • Forum Paper

Does National Regulatory Mandate of Provider Order Entry Portend Greater Benefit Than Risk for Health Care Delivery?

The 2001 ACMI Debate

  1. J Marc Overhage,
  2. Blackford Middleton,
  3. Randolph A Miller,
  4. Rita D Zielstorff,
  5. William R Hersh
  1. Affiliations of the authors: Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (JMO); Harvard Medical School and Partners HealthCare, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts (BM); Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee (RAM); HEALTHvision, Inc, Waltham, Massachusetts (RDZ); Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (WH)
  1. Correspondence and reprints: William Hersh, MD, Professor and Head, Division of Medical Informatics and Outcomes Research, Oregon Health & Science University, Mail Code: BICC, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97201; e-mail: <hersh{at}ohsu.edu>
  • Received 22 January 2002
  • Accepted 22 January 2002

Abstract

The 2001 debate of the American College of Medical Informatics focused on the proposition that national regulatory mandate of computer-based provider order entry (CPOE), to take effect by the end of 2005, portends greater benefit than risk for health care delivery. Both sides accepted that provider order entry offers potential benefit. Those supporting the proposition emphasized public safety, noting that payers have little economic incentive to pay for quality and that a mandate would force vendors to improve the usability and value of their systems. They argued that the mandate would align the economic incentives to finally allow CPOE to be widely adopted. Those opposing the proposition emphasized the risks resulting from a mandate, including the direct implementation costs, the logistic issues of implementation, and the cost of failed implementations. They also noted the potential for errors introduced by the systems themselves and the fact that the safety and utility of commercially available CPOE products have yet to be proved.

Footnotes

  • This paper is a summary of the 2001 ACMI Debate, which took place Nov 7, 2001, at the AMIA Annual Symposium in Washington, DC.

  • * The Medical Gopher is the CPOE system developed and used at Dr. Overhage's institution, and WizOrder is the order entry system developed and used at Dr. Miller's institution.

Access policy for JAMIA

All content published in JAMIA is deposited with PubMed Central by the publisher with a 12 month embargo. Authors/funders may pay an Unlocked fee of $2,000 to make the article free on the JAMIA website and PMC immediately on publication.

All content older than 12 months is freely available on this website.

AMIA members can log in with their JAMIA user name (email address) and password or via the AMIA website.