rss
JAMIA 2002;9:448-460 doi:10.1197/jamia.M1107
  • Focus on Simulation James G. Anderson, Guest Editor
  • Research Paper

Development and Validation of Assessment Measures for a Newly Developed Physical Examination Simulator

  1. Carla M Pugh,
  2. Patricia Youngblood
  1. Affiliations of the authors: Stanford University, Stanford, California
  1. Correspondence and reprints: Carla M. Pugh, MD, PhD, 251 W. Campus Drive, MSOB Suite #232, Stanford Unversity School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5466; e-mail: <cpugh{at}stanford.edu>
  • Received 17 February 2002
  • Accepted 23 July 2002

Abstract

Objective Define, extract and evaluate potential performance indicators from computer-generated data collected during simulated clinical female pelvic examinations.

Design Qualitative and quantitative study analyzing computer generated simulator data and written clinical assessments collected from medical students who performed physical examinations on three clinically different pelvic simulators.

Setting Introduction to patient care course at a major United States medical school.

Participants Seventy-three pre-clinical medical students performed 219 simulated pelvic examinations and generated 219 written clinical assessments.

Measurements Cronbach’s alpha for the newly defined performance indicators, Pearson’s correlation of performance indicators with scored written clinical assessments of simulator findings.

Results Four novel performance indicators were defined: time to perform a complete examination, number of critical areas touched during the exam, the maximum pressure used, and the frequency at which these areas were touched. The reliability coefficients (alpha) were time = 0.7240, critical areas = 0.6329, maximum pressure = 0.7701, and frequency = 0.5011. Of the four indicators, three correlated positively and significantly with the written clinical assessment scores: critical areas, p < 0.01; frequency, p < 0.05; and maximum pressure, p < 0.05.

Conclusion This study demonstrates a novel method of analyzing raw numerical data generated from a newly developed patient simulator; deriving performance indicators from computer generated simulator data; and assessing validity of those indicators by comparing them with written assessment scores. Results show the new assessment measures provide an objective, reliable, and valid method of assessing students’ physical examination techniques on the pelvic exam simulator.

Footnotes

    Access policy for JAMIA

    All content published in JAMIA is deposited with PubMedCentral by the publisher but with varying embargo times. Authors/funders may pay an Unlocked fee of $2,000 to make the article free on the JAMIA website and PMC immediately on publication. Research funded by government and other recognised agencies is deposited with a 12 month embargo. All other content is deposited with a 36 month embargo.

    AMIA members log in here to access the full text of JAMIA.

    Register for free content

    Individuals may register for a free 30 day online trial to all content.

    The Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association is published for the American Medical Informatics Association by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.