Validity of electronic health record-derived quality measurement for performance monitoring
- Primary Care Information Project, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, New York, USA
- Correspondence to Dr Amanda Parsons, Health Care Access & Improvement, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, 42-09 28th Street, 12th Floor, Queens, NY 11101, USA;
- Received 18 August 2011
- Accepted 21 December 2011
- Published Online First 16 January 2012
Background Since 2007, New York City's primary care information project has assisted over 3000 providers to adopt and use a prevention-oriented electronic health record (EHR). Participating practices were taught to re-adjust their workflows to use the EHR built-in population health monitoring tools, including automated quality measures, patient registries and a clinical decision support system. Practices received a comprehensive suite of technical assistance, which included quality improvement, EHR customization and configuration, privacy and security training, and revenue cycle optimization. These services were aimed at helping providers understand how to use their EHR to track and improve the quality of care delivered to patients.
Materials and Methods Retrospective electronic chart reviews of 4081 patient records across 57 practices were analyzed to determine the validity of EHR-derived quality measures and documented preventive services.
Results Results from this study show that workflow and documentation habits have a profound impact on EHR-derived quality measures. Compared with the manual review of electronic charts, EHR-derived measures can undercount practice performance, with a disproportionately negative impact on the number of patients captured as receiving a clinical preventive service or meeting a recommended treatment goal.
Conclusion This study provides a cautionary note in using EHR-derived measurement for public reporting of provider performance or use for payment.
- EHR-derived quality measures
- electronic health records
- electronic medical records
- extension center
- meaningful use measures
- New York City
- primary care
- primary care information project
Funding This study was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (grant nos R18HS17059 and 17294). The funder played no role in the study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval This study was approved by the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene institutional review board no 09067.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.