<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://jamia.bmj.com">
<title>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association Correspondence</title>
<link>http://jamia.bmj.com</link>
<description>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association RSS feed -- recent Correspondence articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1527-974X</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1067-5027</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jamia.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/19/1/143?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jamia.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/5/726?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://jamia.bmj.com/site/homepage/JAMIA_95x60.gif" />
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://jamia.bmj.com/site/homepage/JAMIA_95x60.gif">
<title>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association</title>
<url>http://jamia.bmj.com/site/homepage/JAMIA_95x60.gif</url>
<link>http://jamia.bmj.com</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://jamia.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/19/1/143?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adoption of electronic health records by medical specialty societies]]></title>
<link>http://jamia.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/19/1/143?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Rao <I>et al</I>,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> by identifying barriers to adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) by physicians in small practices, help target interventions. One intervention that merits consideration is the adoption of EHRs by medical specialty societies.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b2">2</cross-ref> A medical specialty society could select an existing web-based EHR and host it on the society's servers for the society's members who have not yet adopted an EHR.</p> <p>Physicians in small practices are concerned about financial barriers.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> Collectively, through their professional association, they would benefit from economies of scale. The American Psychiatric Association has, for example, 36 000 members,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b3">3</cross-ref> of which 30%, or 10 000, may be in small practices.</p> <p>Physicians in small practices are concerned about future obsolescence.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> With the market share delivered by the medical specialty society, the vendor would be able to stay in business and to continue to improve its EHR. Furthermore,...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hsiung, R. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-10T07:38:52-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000593</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:amiajnl;amiajnl-2011-000593</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Informatics Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adoption of electronic health records by medical specialty societies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>143</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>143</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jamia.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/5/726?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[In response to: Electronic health records in small physician practices: availability, use, and perceived benefits]]></title>
<link>http://jamia.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/18/5/726?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>In their report &lsquo;Electronic health records in small physician practices: availability, use, and perceived benefits&rsquo;, Rao <I>et al</I> correctly point out many of the challenges these small practices face when adopting electronic health records (EHR).<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> As part of New York City's Primary Care Information Project, we have deployed EHRs to over 2550 providers in NYC, including over 400 small physician practices. In order to get to a point where these providers feel comfortable using the EHR fully, after implementation they often need intensive technical assistance (eg, workflow redesign, quality improvement support, EHR customization and configuration, revenue cycle management, and ongoing training on EHR features and functionality). We have found that this support, often costing $12 000&ndash;$16 000 per provider, is necessary to help small practice providers meaningfully use their EHRs, and early evaluation of our work has found that small practice providers that receive our assistance have improved usage...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parsons, A., Wu, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-08-16T13:07:37-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000427</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:amiajnl;amiajnl-2011-000427</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Informatics Association</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[In response to: Electronic health records in small physician practices: availability, use, and perceived benefits]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
<prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>726</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>726</prism:endingPage>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
